WHO ARE WE? part 1 - ARE WE ARE THE THE PEOPLE OF THE SUN! Is it hat actually XHAM is?

ARE WE ARE THE THE PEOPLE OF THE SUN! Is it what actually XHAM is?

My Afrikans are trying to connect to their own history, big up Bra Lekuba Ndou Malatjie, Abdul Hamid Ntetha, Shemzu Anu just to mention a few, and to all those many more TRUTH Educating people out there. I want to share some light and love (or what we call HYPOTHESES) to all the people who love the truth! our hidden history as means to unite our people than cause any divisions which are already there much to my surprise that we still behave like we are still in the dark ages, while living in the age of AQUARIUS the age of KNOWING! We all so called Black or Brown People XHAM|Ti/KHAM|Antu/KAMAAT/KAMET! 😲.

What am about to share here will blow the lead open to many of our people who thinks being associated to some type of Clan or tribe is better than the other, in fact you are blatantly wrong! Bantus is just a phrase to say we are the Children of MU'BABA and ANTU. Who is MU'BABA? He is our Father our GOD the Creator! Who is ANTU? She is our Mother our GODDESS the naturer of life!

There is a very urgent question we then need to answer: Are we therefore a tribe or humankind?

Once we start to answer that question we will begin to piece in the hidden history and archaeological evidence that we are all XHAM/KHAM - EN-TI|Gôàb! Then and only then there will be no division and tribalism but one nation and one people. We will also remember our ancient voices never colour coded themselves until the intrusion forces of the evil pale Men stepped into our realm and divided us....... we used to call ourselves PEOPLE OF DIRT/SOIL - that is where the so called Brown colour was adopted and we openly know as Saa'ti or Su'ti or Sotho. Yes that's how we begun to name ourselves and grouped ourselves accordingly....that process was then given a meaning "CLAN Names" e.g. Oo Mdaka, Mdakane, Ngwe, Ngwemvu, Ngwevu, Tyheli, Tyeli, Krwala, Krwada, Ndlovu, Ngcuka, Nkomo, Ngonyama, Xam, Xamba, Xaba, etc etc. (Please note I used used that dialect in order to back up my reasoning, but anyone can therefore translate those words into their own dialect to give a meaning).

---

AMERICA IS AMREK FROM KHAM|ARA PEOPLE

We have travelled to all over the world long before the Nephilim created a pale man. We were instructed by our creator (ENKHAYAH/ENKAYI/ENKAI/ENKI) and his people (ANU'AHULU'HAM/ELOHIM) not to associate ourselves nor mix our genes with that of theirs because ours was that of Pure/Undiluted Gene Connection with that of theirs. When we broke that LAW, they had no choice but to downgrade us closing the connection key with that of theirs in order to safeguard their timelines and bloodlines to also shield their great City NIBIRU/NUBARAH. Are you connecting the dots my brothers and sisters? NIBIRU is the City of the NU (Black) BA (Creators/Pure) RA (God).

Indeed they may and yes have slave traded our people across the world where these Pale/so called Whites set up camps on to master a plan to evilize/evolutionize their new conquest lands into cities with our God's given templates they stole during their invasions across significant places (because their invasions were not random but calculated. They knew what they were after and they got it/them). Before their so called expeditions we already had civilized those areas and injected life and celestial education given to us by the God's on the order of ANU'EL. That is why we have so many so called Blacks (Pure's) in the Americas formerly the XHAM|ARA/KHAM|ANU aka the KHOMANI people 😨, largely known as Amreks by Americans & their historians there on those part of the world. Remember I said we are all XHAM! That is why not all in the now America's was brought there by a slave ship/boat but already they were indigenous of those lands. Yes many lost their names and surnames because it was a Pale Man design for all of us to lose out our names in order disconnect us from our roots the truth!

---

I might not be adequately armed with our original XHAM dialects, nor any of our ancient Dialects which coincidentally corresponds with that of XHAM Dialects all across the World..... but I try to help our people to finally comprehend just how much are we still playing in the field of deception ever implanted to our generations to generations that we have to break before we depart this realm. I am an AQUARIUS living in this AGE OF AQUARIUS....my duties are to elevate the levels of MANKIND CONSCIOUSNESS! and ita start with us, XHAM people! Starting to retrace our lineage means to know how to connect the broken bond between our people. That will lead to complete knowledge of self, and love of being in unison as One People! That is the identity we seek to achieve...... BLACK|NU~KHOE/KHWE|KHOI~BA|FATHER..... from the Blackness came all colours.

According to one of my friends by the name of Willie Nel this is what he shared: Very good take ..I would say... First out of Southern Africa into and out of Africa. Also then the return back to Southern Africa, finding the San here and influenced them too, intermarried,co-exist..being assimilated into each others customs and cultures. Respectfully using own and required knowledge build civilizations together like Mapungubwe,Thulamela,K2 and Great Zimbabwe, acquired cattles, mining, etc. Motadiana Ka Mthenjwa Xaba From whence the Zulus came and where the Bushmen went It is a constant refrain heard in South Africa that the Zulus and the “black” Africans come from the north. This “fact” is so skewed in the way in which it is used and is poorly understood by most so I wish to clarify a few points about the arrival of the Bantu-speaking Africans in Southern Africa. Bantu here is used to refer to a broad linguistic group that belongs to the Niger-Congo group of languages.

---

So I will start by saying that yes the Bantu speakers did come from the north. However, they did not only arrive in the 1600s as often stated; that was apartheid myth-making. The Bantu peoples began arriving in Southern Africa at least 1 800 to 2 000 years ago and newer research keeps pushing that date back. This is shown by the archaeological record that shows Iron-Age furnaces and tools appearing at this stage of prehistory. They arrived in small probably family-based groups bringing with them cattle and hoe agriculture. They did not rush down in some horde massacring the local aboriginals. The aboriginals I refer to here are the Bushmen/San.The Bantu peoples should not be viewed as a singular people, but a broad linguistic group that would have comprised various ethnicities, identities and means of subsistence.

There is little is known of their interaction with the San in the earliest periods of contact. In all likelihood the Bantu would have been few in number, with little power over the indigenous peoples and no central organisation. These things developed in time as the larger ethno-political groups show (Zulu Kingdom for example), but the balance of power would have been originally in favour of the San. They had detailed knowledge of the land and plants, traces that reach through in the healing practices of today. The increasing population pressure and long-term interaction would have eroded the salient differences between peoples through intermarriage, alliances as they have lived side by side for two millennia. Serious conflict appears around the time of centralised power developing, which affected all the peoples of Southern Africa. By this period most San would have been assimilated, their language almost erased and coherent bands would have been relegated to the margins of the mountains and sea. Even these bands exhibited shifting allegiances and ethnicities as see in the colonial records and confusion about the nature of the ethnicity of the people they encountered. There were peoples in colonial Natal that moved between being San and being Zulu depending on circumstances. Their descendants still live in the Drakensberg and claim a San identity (they use the term Abatwa) alongside a Zulu one.The first European settlers in the Western Cape would have encountered aboriginal and other African peoples engaged in multiple forms of subsistence, speaking a variety of languages with no central political authority and would have exhibited a blend of aboriginal hunting gathering, fishing, herding and agriculture.

But make no mistake the other African peoples were already in the region and in fairly large numbers, such as the Xhosa just across the Fish River. For the majority of the San and related groups (Hottentot, Strandlopers) their languages have been lost as were many cultural practices and knowledge, even while influencing the dominant culture of which they became part of.The Bantu language would have been modified as a result of continuous social contact of trade, marriage and so on. One of these developed into the Nguni language group of today, which contain the distinctive three “click” consonants (isiZulu, isiXhosa, isiNdebele, siSwati).

---

These are a direct legacy not of conquest, but assimilation and sharing. This of course does not mean that San people were not killed in some areas, but that the pre-historical picture is a lot more nuanced than often reported and was not just a simple massacre. There is also evidence genetically about the connection between San and Bantu peoples where contemporary populations of Zulu- and Xhosa-speaking peoples have on average almost as many Khoisan as Bantu ancestors, and about 15% of the words of both languages contain click consonants derived from Khoisan. Khoisan refers to a larger family group of related languages and not the contemporary peoples who may or may not speak a language from this family.So next time you hear that the Zulus came from the north, please correct that fallacy. Their ancestors came from the north 2 000 years ago, and in conjunction with the local indigenous people they developed a new culture and identity and created a new language family. The Bushmen are still around in the Northern Cape, in the Kalahari and number about 110 000, but there are in fact even more descendants of various hues, shades and mixes. They are also present in the Nguni languages and people as well as the Cape coloured in an undisclosed and often unacknowledged admixture.Far too often the notion of a northern descent is used to justify colonial land acquisition and excesses.

The apartheid myth was a powerful one that was deeply embedded in school curriculum and its legacy is still heard today. History (and prehistory) is always contested and laced through with the politics of the times. Migration and movement of peoples may create strife and conflict, but it may also creates new identities and bring new ideas. The Bantu migration saw many languages and cultures ultimately disappear, but it also brought new crops, iron and technologies. And the same goes for the European peoples that arrived bringing strife and conflict, but also new ideas and technologies. The time for drawing lines between the peoples of Africa is well past its time. At core we are all one and we need to work together to find new identities, new ideas and new futures."

So it must be now clear that indeed we the Brown & Black People are XHAM before any tribalistic view that pursue the divide mundane principles.

---